Kilovolt-amperes (kVA) represent the apparent power of an electrical circuit. This measurement differs from kilowatts (kW), which represent real power, by accounting for the power factor. Calculation of this value is often necessary to appropriately size generators, transformers, and other electrical equipment. The process generally involves considering the voltage and current in the circuit, or, alternatively, using the kW value and the power factor.
Accurate assessment of apparent power is crucial for preventing equipment overload and ensuring efficient operation. Undersizing equipment can lead to premature failure and downtime, while oversizing can result in unnecessary expense. Understanding the apparent power demands of a system contributes significantly to the reliable and cost-effective operation of electrical infrastructure. Historically, improvements in power factor correction technologies have been driven by the need to minimize the difference between apparent and real power, reducing losses and increasing overall system efficiency.
The subsequent sections will detail methods for calculating this power value in various scenarios, including those where voltage and current are known, and those where only the real power (kW) and power factor are available. These methods will cover both single-phase and three-phase systems, providing a comprehensive guide to determining the required power rating.
1. Voltage Measurement
Voltage measurement is a critical component in determining kilovolt-amperes (kVA), as it forms a direct relationship with current in the apparent power calculation. An inaccurate voltage reading will inherently propagate errors into the kVA calculation, leading to potentially undersized or oversized equipment. For example, if a system operates at a consistently lower voltage than anticipated, the current draw will increase to deliver the same power, resulting in a higher apparent power and requiring a larger kVA rated device. Conversely, an overestimation of voltage would lead to an underestimation of the necessary kVA, posing a risk of equipment overload and potential damage.
The process of acquiring voltage data requires meticulous attention to detail. Instruments employed for the measurement, such as voltmeters, should possess verifiable calibration and accuracy. Furthermore, understanding the system’s voltage profile under varying load conditions is necessary. Capturing voltage readings during peak demand periods is especially vital, as voltage sags can occur due to impedance in the power distribution system. Ignoring these voltage drops can significantly skew the assessment of the actual kVA demand, thereby compromising the equipment sizing process. Furthermore, the type of voltage being measured, whether phase-to-neutral or phase-to-phase, must be correctly identified for accurate kVA calculation, particularly in three-phase systems.
In summary, precise voltage measurement is paramount for correctly determining the apparent power demand. Errors in voltage data translate directly to errors in the resulting kVA value, potentially jeopardizing system reliability and efficiency. A comprehensive understanding of voltage behavior under different operating conditions and the use of properly calibrated measurement tools are essential for ensuring an accurate kVA calculation, ultimately safeguarding equipment and optimizing overall system performance.
2. Current Assessment
The assessment of current is inextricably linked to the determination of kilovolt-amperes (kVA). Current, measured in amperes, represents the flow of electrical charge within a circuit. Given a fixed voltage, an increase in current directly corresponds to an increase in the apparent power demand, expressed in kVA. Inadequate current assessment directly impacts the accuracy of the kVA calculation, potentially leading to the selection of undersized electrical equipment. Consider a manufacturing facility with welding equipment. If the peak current draw of the welders is underestimated, the calculated kVA will be insufficient, leading to possible transformer overload during simultaneous welding operations, and ultimately resulting in system downtime.
Effective current assessment necessitates the use of appropriate measuring instruments, such as clamp meters or ammeters, capable of accurately capturing the range of expected current values. Furthermore, it is critical to understand the nature of the load and whether it is linear or non-linear. Non-linear loads, such as variable frequency drives (VFDs) and electronic ballasts, generate harmonic currents that distort the sinusoidal waveform. These harmonic currents contribute to the overall apparent power demand but may not be accurately reflected in simple current measurements. In such scenarios, true RMS (Root Mean Square) current measurements are essential to capture the total current, including harmonic components, for a correct kVA determination. Ignoring these harmonic components can result in significant underestimation of the apparent power and potential equipment failure.
In summary, a thorough current assessment is paramount to accurately determine the kVA requirements of an electrical system. This assessment should encompass accurate measurements using appropriate instruments, an understanding of the load characteristics (linear or non-linear), and consideration of harmonic currents where applicable. The correct determination of apparent power prevents equipment overload, ensures system reliability, and optimizes electrical system efficiency, demonstrating the practical significance of accurate current assessment in determining kVA.
3. Power Factor
Power factor is an integral component in the determination of kilovolt-amperes (kVA). It represents the ratio of real power (kW) to apparent power (kVA), indicating the efficiency with which electrical power is utilized. A low power factor signifies a larger proportion of reactive power, contributing to a higher apparent power demand without a corresponding increase in useful work.
-
Definition and Significance
Power factor is the cosine of the angle between the voltage and current waveforms. A power factor of 1, or unity, indicates that voltage and current are in phase, resulting in maximum power utilization. A lower power factor, such as 0.8, suggests a phase difference, implying that a portion of the current is not contributing to real power. In industrial settings, poor power factor leads to increased energy losses in the distribution system and potentially incurring utility penalties.
-
Impact on kVA Calculation
The relationship between power factor and kVA is inversely proportional when real power is constant. For a given real power (kW) requirement, a lower power factor will necessitate a higher kVA rating for equipment such as generators and transformers. For instance, a 100 kW load with a power factor of 0.8 requires a kVA of 125 (100 / 0.8 = 125). Conversely, the same load with a power factor of 0.95 requires only 105.3 kVA (100 / 0.95 = 105.3). This demonstrates the impact of power factor on equipment sizing and cost.
-
Causes of Low Power Factor
Inductive loads, such as motors, transformers, and fluorescent lighting ballasts, are primary contributors to low power factor. These devices draw reactive power to establish magnetic fields necessary for their operation. Capacitive loads can improve the power factor, but are less commonly found in typical industrial settings, resulting in a net lagging power factor in most cases. Non-linear loads, such as variable frequency drives and switching power supplies, also contribute to distorted current waveforms and reduced power factor.
-
Power Factor Correction
Power factor correction techniques involve adding capacitive reactance to compensate for the inductive reactance of the load. This is typically achieved through the installation of capacitor banks at strategic points within the electrical distribution system. By improving the power factor, the kVA demand is reduced, allowing existing equipment to handle more load and potentially avoiding costly upgrades. Utilities often incentivize power factor correction through reduced billing rates or penalties for low power factor.
The accurate assessment and management of power factor are crucial for optimizing electrical system performance and minimizing kVA demand. By understanding the causes and effects of low power factor, engineers and facility managers can implement appropriate correction strategies to improve system efficiency, reduce energy costs, and ensure the reliable operation of electrical equipment. Failure to account for power factor in kVA calculations can lead to undersized equipment, increased energy losses, and potential system instability. Therefore, it stands as a pivotal parameter in the procedure.
4. Real Power (kW)
Real power, measured in kilowatts (kW), represents the actual power consumed by a load and converted into useful work. Its relationship to kilovolt-amperes (kVA) is fundamental, as the ratio between these two values directly influences the efficiency of power utilization within an electrical system. An understanding of this relationship is crucial for accurate equipment sizing and cost-effective energy management.
-
Definition and Measurement
Real power (kW) is the power dissipated by a circuit, performing work such as heating, lighting, or rotating a motor shaft. It is calculated by multiplying the voltage, current, and the power factor. Measurement typically involves using a power analyzer or wattmeter to directly quantify the power being consumed over a specific period. In industrial settings, tracking real power consumption is essential for monitoring operational efficiency and identifying areas for energy conservation.
-
The kW to kVA Relationship
The relationship between real power (kW) and apparent power (kVA) is defined by the power factor: kW = kVA * Power Factor. Consequently, kVA = kW / Power Factor. This equation underscores that for a given real power demand, the apparent power requirement, and therefore the necessary kVA rating of equipment, is inversely proportional to the power factor. A lower power factor necessitates a higher kVA to deliver the same amount of real power.
-
Impact of Power Factor on kVA Requirements
A low power factor increases the kVA demand without a corresponding increase in useful power. For example, a 100 kW load operating at a power factor of 0.7 requires a kVA of 142.9, while the same load at a power factor of 0.95 needs only 105.3 kVA. This difference highlights the importance of power factor correction. Correcting power factor reduces the kVA demand, potentially allowing existing equipment to handle more load or deferring costly upgrades.
-
kW as a Basis for kVA Calculation
When the real power demand (kW) and power factor are known, determining the required kVA becomes straightforward. This scenario is common in system design and equipment selection. For instance, if a new machine requires 50 kW and the anticipated power factor is 0.85, the required kVA can be calculated as 50 / 0.85 = 58.8 kVA. This kVA value informs the selection of appropriately sized generators, transformers, and other electrical components.
In conclusion, real power (kW) serves as a fundamental input in determining the kilovolt-amperes (kVA) requirements of an electrical system. Its relationship with the power factor dictates the efficiency of power utilization and the necessary kVA rating of equipment. Accurate assessment of kW demand, coupled with effective power factor management, ensures optimal system performance, reduced energy costs, and reliable operation of electrical infrastructure.
5. Phase Consideration
Phase consideration is a critical factor in determining kilovolt-amperes (kVA), impacting the calculation methodology and the subsequent selection of appropriately rated electrical equipment. The number of phases in an electrical system dictates the formulas used to calculate apparent power, and a misunderstanding of the phase configuration can lead to significant errors in the kVA determination.
-
Single-Phase Systems
In single-phase systems, the apparent power is calculated by multiplying the voltage (V) and the current (I): kVA = (V I) / 1000. This simplified formula is applicable to residential power distribution and certain light commercial applications. A typical example is a 120V circuit powering lighting and small appliances. Accurate measurement of voltage and current is still vital, but the calculation itself is straightforward, assuming a purely resistive load.
-
Three-Phase Systems – Balanced Loads
Three-phase systems, common in industrial and large commercial settings, require a modified calculation. For balanced three-phase loads, where the load is evenly distributed across all three phases, the formula is: kVA = (3 VL-L IL) / 1000, where VL-L is the line-to-line voltage and IL is the line current. An example is a three-phase motor drawing balanced current from a 480V supply. Failure to include the 3 factor will result in a significant underestimation of the apparent power.
-
Three-Phase Systems – Unbalanced Loads
In practical three-phase systems, perfect balance is rare. Unbalanced loads, where the current draw varies between phases, necessitate a more complex approach. The apparent power must be calculated for each phase individually, and then summed to determine the total kVA. This requires measuring the voltage and current in each phase separately and applying the single-phase formula to each. A facility with a mix of single-phase and three-phase equipment connected to the same three-phase distribution panel is an example of a situation requiring per-phase kVA calculation.
-
Phase-to-Neutral vs. Phase-to-Phase Voltage
In three-phase systems, it is imperative to differentiate between phase-to-neutral voltage (VL-N) and phase-to-phase voltage (VL-L). Using the incorrect voltage value in the kVA calculation will lead to inaccurate results. The formula VL-L = 3 VL-N applies. For instance, a 208V/120V three-phase system has a phase-to-phase voltage of 208V and a phase-to-neutral voltage of 120V. Using 120V instead of 208V in the three-phase kVA formula will yield a drastically lower, incorrect result.
The accurate consideration of the phase configuration of an electrical system is paramount to the correct determination of kVA. The formulas and methodologies employed differ significantly between single-phase and three-phase systems, and further complexities arise with unbalanced loads. A thorough understanding of these phase-related factors is essential for electrical engineers and technicians to ensure the proper sizing of equipment, prevent system overloads, and maintain reliable operation.
6. System Load
System load, representing the aggregate demand for electrical power within a defined network, constitutes a primary determinant in assessing kilovolt-amperes (kVA). The accurate quantification of system load is paramount for selecting appropriately sized electrical equipment, ensuring both operational efficiency and system reliability.
-
Peak Demand Assessment
Peak demand, the highest level of power consumption over a specified period, directly influences the required kVA capacity. Underestimating peak demand can result in equipment overload and system failure. Industrial facilities, for example, experience peak demand during periods of maximum production. This surge in demand must be accurately predicted and factored into the kVA calculation to prevent disruptions and ensure the electrical system can accommodate the operational requirements.
-
Diversity Factor Consideration
The diversity factor represents the ratio of the sum of individual maximum demands to the maximum demand of the entire system. Recognizing the diversity factor is critical, as it acknowledges that not all loads operate at their maximum demand simultaneously. Ignoring this factor leads to an inflated kVA calculation and oversizing of equipment. A residential complex, where not all residents use maximum power at the same time, exemplifies the importance of applying the diversity factor.
-
Future Load Growth Anticipation
Determining kVA necessitates accounting for potential future increases in system load. Overlooking future expansion can render equipment inadequate as demand grows, leading to costly replacements. Manufacturing plants, for instance, often expand production capacity, requiring additional equipment and increased power consumption. Predicting this growth and incorporating it into the initial kVA assessment ensures the electrical system can accommodate future needs without requiring immediate upgrades.
-
Load Profiling and Analysis
Load profiling involves analyzing historical power consumption patterns to predict future demand. This analysis aids in identifying cyclical variations and anticipating peak periods. Industrial facilities, where production schedules and operational processes significantly influence load profiles, benefit from detailed analysis. Understanding these patterns allows for more precise kVA calculation, optimizing equipment selection and reducing the risk of both under- and over-sizing.
The interplay between system load and kVA is fundamental to electrical system design. Accurate assessment of peak demand, consideration of the diversity factor, anticipation of future load growth, and detailed load profiling are all essential for determining the appropriate kVA rating of electrical equipment. The insights gained from these factors culminate in a comprehensive understanding of the power requirements, enabling informed decisions that promote system reliability and operational efficiency.
7. Equipment Efficiency
Equipment efficiency directly impacts the determination of kilovolt-amperes (kVA) by influencing the amount of power required to perform a given task. Inefficient equipment necessitates a higher apparent power draw to compensate for energy losses, consequently affecting the required kVA rating for the supporting electrical infrastructure. Therefore, accounting for efficiency is crucial for accurate equipment sizing and minimizing operational costs.
-
Motor Efficiency and Load Matching
Electric motors, ubiquitous in industrial applications, exhibit varying levels of efficiency. A less efficient motor consumes more power to deliver the same mechanical output, increasing the kVA demand. Furthermore, motors operating significantly below their rated load also experience reduced efficiency. Selecting appropriately sized, high-efficiency motors and ensuring proper load matching minimizes wasted energy and reduces the required kVA capacity for the system.
-
Transformer Losses
Transformers, essential components in power distribution, inherently experience energy losses in the form of core and copper losses. These losses contribute to the overall kVA demand of the system. High-efficiency transformers minimize these losses, reducing the apparent power requirement and potentially lowering the required kVA capacity of upstream equipment. Load factor also influences transformer efficiency; transformers operating at or near their rated capacity generally exhibit higher efficiency than those lightly loaded.
-
Lighting System Efficiency
Lighting systems constitute a significant portion of electrical load in many facilities. Traditional incandescent lighting is inherently inefficient, converting a small fraction of electrical energy into visible light, with the remainder dissipated as heat. Replacing incandescent lighting with more efficient alternatives, such as LEDs, drastically reduces the power consumption and, consequently, the kVA demand. Furthermore, implementing lighting control systems, such as occupancy sensors, optimizes lighting usage and further minimizes energy waste.
-
Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs) and Efficiency Optimization
Variable frequency drives (VFDs) control the speed of electric motors, enabling energy savings by matching motor output to the actual load demand. While VFDs themselves introduce some energy losses, the overall impact on system efficiency is typically positive, particularly in applications with variable loads. By reducing motor speed during periods of reduced demand, VFDs minimize energy waste and lower the kVA requirement compared to constant-speed operation.
Consideration of equipment efficiency across various components of an electrical system is paramount to accurately determine the required kVA. Neglecting efficiency losses leads to an underestimation of the apparent power demand and potentially results in undersized equipment. By prioritizing high-efficiency equipment and optimizing system operation, the kVA requirements can be minimized, resulting in lower energy costs and improved system reliability. The cumulative effect of improved equipment efficiencies throughout a facility significantly impacts the overall power demand and the necessary electrical infrastructure.
8. Calculation Formula
The selection of a suitable calculation formula is fundamental to determining kilovolt-amperes (kVA). The specific formula employed depends on the characteristics of the electrical system, including voltage, current, power factor, and number of phases. Accurate application of the correct formula ensures precise kVA calculation, crucial for equipment sizing and system design.
-
Single-Phase kVA Calculation
In a single-phase system, the kVA calculation involves multiplying the voltage (in volts) by the current (in amperes) and dividing by 1000: kVA = (V I) / 1000. This formula is suitable for residential circuits and light commercial applications. For example, a device operating at 120 volts and drawing 10 amps has an apparent power of 1.2 kVA. Accurate measurements of voltage and current are essential for a reliable kVA determination using this formula. Omitting the division by 1000 will result in a value expressed in volt-amperes (VA), necessitating the conversion to kVA for practical application.
-
Three-Phase kVA Calculation with Balanced Loads
For balanced three-phase systems, the kVA calculation incorporates the line-to-line voltage (VL-L), the line current (IL), and a constant factor of 3 (approximately 1.732): kVA = (3 VL-L * IL) / 1000. This formula applies when the load is evenly distributed across all three phases. Consider a balanced three-phase motor connected to a 480V supply and drawing 20 amps per line. The apparent power is approximately 16.63 kVA. Incorrectly applying the single-phase formula to a three-phase system will underestimate the apparent power demand, potentially leading to equipment overload.
-
Three-Phase kVA Calculation with Power Factor
When considering the power factor (PF), the calculation of kVA incorporates real power (kW): kVA = kW / PF. This formula is useful when the real power and power factor are known but voltage and current measurements are not readily available. For instance, a 100 kW load with a power factor of 0.8 requires an apparent power of 125 kVA. Failing to account for power factor in kVA calculations results in an inaccurate assessment of the system’s apparent power requirement.
-
Accounting for Voltage Drop
In practical applications, voltage drop along conductors can affect the accuracy of kVA calculations. If the voltage at the load is significantly lower than the source voltage, using the source voltage in the calculation will overestimate the kVA demand. It is prudent to measure or estimate the voltage at the load point, particularly over long cable runs, to ensure the kVA calculation reflects the actual operating conditions. Significant voltage drops can necessitate the use of larger conductors to minimize losses and maintain voltage levels within acceptable limits.
In summary, the selection and correct application of the appropriate calculation formula are essential for accurately determining kVA. Factors such as the number of phases, load balance, power factor, and voltage drop influence the choice of formula and the interpretation of results. Mastery of these calculation methodologies empowers electrical engineers and technicians to design efficient and reliable electrical systems, ensuring proper equipment sizing and minimizing the risk of system failures.
9. Safety Margins
The incorporation of safety margins is a critical aspect of determining kilovolt-amperes (kVA) for electrical systems. This practice involves intentionally oversizing electrical equipment beyond the calculated kVA requirement to accommodate unforeseen circumstances and ensure reliable operation under varying conditions. Failure to include adequate safety margins increases the risk of equipment overload, premature failure, and potential system downtime. For instance, a manufacturing plant expanding its production line might experience an unexpected increase in power demand, exceeding the originally calculated kVA capacity of its transformer. A safety margin built into the initial transformer selection would mitigate this risk, allowing the system to accommodate the increased load without requiring immediate and costly equipment replacement.
The appropriate magnitude of the safety margin is contingent upon several factors, including the nature of the load, the criticality of the application, and the potential for future expansion. Applications with highly variable loads or those deemed essential for continuous operation often warrant larger safety margins. For example, a hospital emergency power system requires a substantial safety margin to ensure uninterrupted power supply during critical events. Furthermore, the accuracy of the load calculations plays a role. If the load calculations are based on estimated values or lack detailed information, a larger safety margin is advisable to compensate for potential uncertainties. Conversely, systems with well-defined and stable loads may require smaller margins.
In conclusion, safety margins represent an essential element of responsible kVA determination. The practice mitigates the risks associated with unforeseen load increases, inaccurate calculations, and inherent equipment variations. While oversizing equipment incurs additional upfront costs, the long-term benefits of enhanced system reliability, reduced downtime, and deferred equipment upgrades often outweigh the initial investment. Careful consideration of the factors influencing the appropriate safety margin ensures a robust and dependable electrical system capable of meeting current and future demands.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following questions address common points of confusion regarding the determination of kVA in electrical systems. These answers aim to clarify key concepts and provide practical guidance for accurate kVA calculation.
Question 1: Why is it essential to differentiate between kW and kVA?
Kilowatts (kW) represent real power, the power performing actual work. Kilovolt-amperes (kVA) represent apparent power, the total power supplied to a circuit, including both real and reactive power. The difference, defined by the power factor, is crucial for equipment sizing; undersized equipment based solely on kW may overload due to the additional reactive power demand reflected in the kVA.
Question 2: How does a low power factor impact the required kVA?
A low power factor indicates a significant proportion of reactive power. For a given real power (kW) demand, a lower power factor necessitates a higher kVA rating for equipment. Failing to account for power factor in kVA calculations can result in the selection of undersized equipment and increased energy losses within the system.
Question 3: What is the appropriate formula for calculating kVA in a three-phase system?
For a balanced three-phase system, the kVA is calculated using the formula: kVA = (3 VL-L IL) / 1000, where VL-L is the line-to-line voltage and IL is the line current. In unbalanced systems, the kVA must be calculated separately for each phase and then summed to determine the total apparent power.
Question 4: Why are safety margins necessary when determining kVA?
Safety margins provide a buffer for unforeseen load increases, inaccurate load calculations, and potential equipment variations. Oversizing equipment slightly beyond the calculated kVA requirement enhances system reliability and prevents premature equipment failure due to unexpected demand surges.
Question 5: How does equipment efficiency affect the required kVA?
Inefficient equipment requires a higher apparent power draw to deliver the same amount of useful work. Energy losses in equipment such as motors and transformers contribute to the overall kVA demand of the system. Utilizing high-efficiency equipment reduces these losses and minimizes the required kVA capacity.
Question 6: What steps should be taken when future load growth is anticipated?
The determination of kVA should always account for potential future increases in system load. Overlooking future expansion can render equipment inadequate as demand grows, leading to costly replacements. Consulting with electrical engineers to anticipate these potential increases is a responsible step.
Accurate assessment of kVA is a critical aspect of electrical system design and management. Proper consideration of the factors discussed above ensures optimal system performance, reliable operation, and minimized energy costs.
The following section will delve into specific case studies, illustrating the practical application of these principles in real-world scenarios.
Essential Guidance
The subsequent directives aim to refine the process of accurately establishing kilovolt-amperes (kVA) in various electrical system configurations. Adherence to these guidelines promotes precision in equipment selection and mitigates potential operational inefficiencies.
Tip 1: Emphasize Accurate Voltage Measurement: Utilize calibrated instruments to ascertain voltage levels. Erroneous voltage data directly impacts the kVA calculation. Account for potential voltage drops under load conditions, particularly in extended cable runs.
Tip 2: Prioritize Comprehensive Current Assessment: Employ appropriate measuring devices to capture the full spectrum of current values. Differentiate between linear and non-linear loads; non-linear loads necessitate true RMS current measurements to capture harmonic components accurately.
Tip 3: Integrate Power Factor Correction Measures: Implement power factor correction techniques to minimize the disparity between real power (kW) and apparent power (kVA). Employ capacitor banks to offset inductive reactance, thereby reducing the overall kVA demand and optimizing system efficiency.
Tip 4: Conduct Load Profiling and Peak Demand Analysis: Analyze historical power consumption patterns to anticipate peak demand periods. Implement load shedding strategies to mitigate peak demand surges and optimize equipment utilization. Consider data logging for precise load profile documentation.
Tip 5: Account for Equipment Efficiency Ratings: Integrate equipment efficiency ratings into the kVA determination process. Select high-efficiency motors and transformers to minimize energy losses and reduce the overall kVA demand. Regularly assess and maintain equipment to uphold optimal efficiency.
Tip 6: Incorporate a Safety Margin Based on Application: Employ a safety margin contingent upon the criticality and variability of the load. Essential systems and those with fluctuating demand necessitate a larger safety margin. Re-evaluate safety margins periodically to accommodate evolving operational requirements.
Consistent application of these directives will refine the precision of kVA calculations, fostering the selection of appropriately sized electrical equipment and optimizing the efficiency and reliability of electrical systems.
The concluding section will summarize the key principles discussed and emphasize the importance of meticulous attention to detail in the determination of kVA, solidifying its importance within overall system design.
Conclusion
This exploration has underscored the critical processes involved in determining kilovolt-amperes (kVA) within electrical systems. Accurate assessment of voltage, current, power factor, and system load, coupled with appropriate formula selection and the strategic application of safety margins, remains paramount. The economic and operational ramifications of imprecise kVA determination are substantial, impacting equipment longevity and system efficiency.
Continued vigilance in applying these principles, along with ongoing professional development, will serve to mitigate risks and optimize electrical infrastructure performance. The methodologies presented provide a robust framework for ensuring the reliability and cost-effectiveness of electrical systems in an increasingly demanding technological landscape.
