The pursuit of records depicting the arrest of individuals under the age of 18, specifically photographic images taken upon booking, presents unique legal and ethical challenges. Access to these records is significantly restricted due to laws designed to protect the privacy and future opportunities of minors. An example would be attempting to obtain a photograph taken when a 16-year-old was processed by law enforcement for a misdemeanor offense.
The importance of safeguarding juvenile records stems from a recognition that youthful mistakes should not permanently stigmatize an individual. Releasing these images could negatively impact educational opportunities, employment prospects, and overall social integration. Historically, juvenile justice systems have prioritized rehabilitation over punishment, emphasizing the need to minimize long-term consequences for youthful offenders.
The following information will explore the legal framework governing juvenile records, the limited circumstances under which access may be granted, and the ethical considerations surrounding the release or dissemination of information related to juvenile arrests.
1. Legality
The legality surrounding the pursuit of juvenile arrest photographs forms the primary barrier to their accessibility. Federal and state laws prioritize the confidentiality of juvenile records, creating significant obstacles to their release. These legal frameworks acknowledge the potential for lasting harm to a young person’s future prospects if arrest records are made publicly available. Therefore, any attempt to access such images must navigate a complex web of statutes designed to protect the privacy of minors. Understanding these laws is the first, and often insurmountable, step in determining whether access is even theoretically possible.
Specifically, states often have statutes that automatically seal or expunge juvenile records upon the individual reaching adulthood, or after a specified period of good behavior. Even in states without automatic sealing provisions, a judge will usually order the sealing of juvenile records following a petition, absent compelling reasons to deny the request. A real-life example would be a news organization attempting to obtain a photograph of a juvenile arrested for vandalism. Despite the public interest in reporting on local crime, legal restrictions on juvenile records would likely prevent the release of the image and identifying information. This underscores the practical significance of understanding the applicable legal standards before attempting to obtain these types of records. Absent a court order compelling release, or a very narrow exception carved out in state law, the release would be a violation of law.
In summary, the legal landscape governing juvenile records significantly restricts access to arrest photographs. These restrictions reflect a societal commitment to protecting minors and providing them with opportunities for rehabilitation. Any attempt to obtain these records must be grounded in a thorough understanding of applicable federal and state laws, recognizing that the presumption is against disclosure. Challenges will invariably arise, and access is extremely unlikely without demonstrable and legally compelling justification.
2. Confidentiality
Confidentiality serves as a cornerstone principle in juvenile justice, directly impacting the accessibility of arrest photographs. Laws and regulations are designed to safeguard the identities and records of minors involved in the legal system. The stringent protection afforded by confidentiality protocols significantly restricts access to information, including visual records.
-
Statutory Mandates
State and federal statutes explicitly mandate the confidentiality of juvenile records. These laws often prohibit the release of any information that could identify a minor involved in legal proceedings, including photographs. For example, a state law might forbid the public dissemination of booking photos of individuals under 18, even if the same information would be accessible for adults. These statutory mandates directly impede the process of discovering these images.
-
Data Security Protocols
Law enforcement agencies and court systems implement data security protocols to protect juvenile records from unauthorized access. These protocols may include restricted access databases, encryption of digital files, and strict adherence to internal policies regarding the handling of sensitive information. A breach of these security protocols could result in legal repercussions for the agency or individual responsible, further emphasizing the commitment to confidentiality.
-
Redaction and Anonymization
In rare instances where some information from a juvenile case is released, redaction and anonymization techniques are often employed. Identifying details, such as names, addresses, and birthdates, are removed to prevent the identification of the individual. Facial recognition technology may even be used to obscure the minor’s face in any photographs released. These measures significantly limit the potential to locate a usable arrest photograph.
-
Purpose Limitations
Even when access to juvenile records is granted for a specific purpose, such as research or legal proceedings, strict limitations are placed on how the information can be used and disseminated. The information cannot be used for purposes outside the scope of the original authorization. This restriction on use underscores the paramount importance of maintaining confidentiality and preventing the unauthorized exposure of juvenile information, including arrest photographs.
The multifaceted nature of confidentiality within the juvenile justice system profoundly restricts the ability to locate arrest photographs of minors. Statutory mandates, data security protocols, redaction techniques, and purpose limitations all contribute to a system that prioritizes the protection of juvenile identities and records. This commitment to confidentiality serves as a significant barrier to accessing juvenile arrest photographs.
3. State Statutes
State statutes represent the most significant determining factor in the accessibility of juvenile arrest photographs. These laws, enacted by individual state legislatures, dictate the specific rules and regulations governing juvenile records, including conditions for release or restriction.
-
Record Sealing and Expungement Laws
Many states have laws that automatically seal or expunge juvenile records upon the individual reaching a certain age or fulfilling specific conditions, such as completing a probationary period without further offenses. For example, a state law may mandate that a juvenile’s arrest record is automatically sealed at age 18, rendering it inaccessible to the public. Such laws directly prevent the release of any related photographs. These laws are not uniform across states, creating a patchwork of regulations that greatly impact photograph availability.
-
Definition of Juvenile Records
State statutes define what constitutes a juvenile record. The definition directly affects what information falls under the protective umbrella of the law. If a booking photograph is considered part of the juvenile record, it is then subject to the confidentiality provisions. States vary in their approach; some may include booking photographs as core parts of the record, while others may treat them differently. The definition is often specific and legally precise, therefore significantly shaping accessibility.
-
Exceptions to Confidentiality
While most state statutes aim to protect juvenile records, exceptions can exist under specific circumstances. For example, some states might allow access to juvenile records in cases involving serious violent felonies, particularly if the juvenile is being tried as an adult. These exceptions are narrowly defined and often require a court order. The existence and scope of these exceptions dictate under what limited conditions a booking photograph might be lawfully obtained, requiring very specific fact patterns.
-
Dissemination and Use Restrictions
Even if a state statute permits access to juvenile records under certain conditions, it often places strict limitations on how the information can be disseminated or used. For instance, a statute might allow a news organization to report on a juvenile court proceeding but prohibit the publication of the juvenile’s photograph. These restrictions aim to balance public transparency with the need to protect the juvenile’s privacy and future opportunities. Understanding these restrictions is critical, as unauthorized dissemination can lead to legal repercussions.
Therefore, understanding the specific state statute in the relevant jurisdiction is the critical first step in assessing the feasibility of accessing juvenile arrest photographs. These statutes create the legal landscape that defines what is permissible and what is prohibited. Variations across states highlight the importance of consulting legal counsel familiar with the laws of the specific jurisdiction.
4. Judicial Oversight
Judicial oversight constitutes a critical element in the process of accessing juvenile arrest photographs. Courts serve as gatekeepers, ensuring that any release of such records adheres strictly to legal standards and protects the best interests of the juvenile. The role of the judiciary is particularly significant due to the sensitive nature of juvenile records and the potential for lasting harm if they are improperly disclosed.
-
Court Orders for Release
In most jurisdictions, a court order is required before any juvenile arrest photograph can be released to the public or to private entities. The process of obtaining such an order typically involves demonstrating a compelling need for the record and convincing the court that the release will not unduly harm the juvenile. For example, a news organization seeking to publish a photograph of a juvenile defendant in a high-profile case would likely need to petition the court and argue that the public interest outweighs the privacy concerns. The court’s decision hinges on a careful balancing of competing interests, with a strong presumption in favor of protecting the juvenile’s confidentiality.
-
Review of Petitions for Access
Courts exercise oversight by carefully reviewing petitions for access to juvenile records. This review process involves scrutinizing the petitioner’s stated purpose, assessing the potential impact on the juvenile, and ensuring compliance with applicable state and federal laws. A judge might deny a petition if it is deemed frivolous, lacks a legitimate purpose, or poses an unreasonable risk to the juvenile’s well-being. The review serves as a crucial safeguard against the unauthorized or inappropriate disclosure of sensitive information.
-
Balancing Public Interest vs. Juvenile Privacy
One of the most challenging aspects of judicial oversight is balancing the public interest in transparency and accountability with the juvenile’s right to privacy. Courts must consider whether the release of an arrest photograph would serve a legitimate public purpose, such as informing the community about a serious crime or promoting public safety. However, they must also weigh the potential harm to the juvenile, including stigmatization, reputational damage, and the long-term impact on educational and employment opportunities. For instance, even if the juvenile committed a serious offense, a court might refuse to release the photograph if it believes that doing so would undermine the juvenile’s rehabilitation efforts.
-
Conditions and Restrictions on Release
Even when a court grants access to a juvenile arrest photograph, it may impose conditions and restrictions on its use. For example, the court might allow the photograph to be used in a specific legal proceeding but prohibit its publication in the media. Or, the court might require that the juvenile’s identity be anonymized or that the photograph be altered to obscure their face. These conditions are designed to minimize the potential harm to the juvenile while still allowing for the legitimate use of the information. Failure to comply with these conditions can result in legal sanctions.
In conclusion, judicial oversight acts as a critical check on the accessibility of juvenile arrest photographs. Through the requirement of court orders, the careful review of petitions, the balancing of competing interests, and the imposition of conditions and restrictions, the judiciary plays a vital role in protecting the privacy and well-being of juveniles while ensuring accountability and transparency in the legal system. The specific circumstances of each case, as well as the relevant state and federal laws, will ultimately determine whether access to a juvenile arrest photograph is granted.
5. Record Sealing
Record sealing represents a legal process that directly impacts the accessibility of juvenile arrest photographs. When a juvenile record is sealed, it is effectively removed from public view, making it significantly more difficult, and in most cases, impossible, to obtain related images.
-
Definition and Scope of Record Sealing
Record sealing involves a court order that restricts access to a juvenile’s records. This order typically prevents public agencies, employers, and private individuals from viewing the sealed records. The scope of sealing can vary by jurisdiction, potentially affecting all records related to the arrest, including police reports, court documents, and booking photographs. If a photograph is considered part of the sealed record, it becomes inaccessible, regardless of prior availability. For example, a news outlet that previously had access to a juvenile’s arrest information would lose that access once the record is sealed.
-
Impact on Accessibility of Mugshots
The sealing of a juvenile record has a direct and profound impact on photograph accessibility. Once a record is sealed, the photograph is typically removed from any public databases or online repositories. Law enforcement agencies are often prohibited from releasing the photograph, even in response to public records requests. The sealing order essentially erases the photograph’s visibility, making it virtually impossible to find through conventional means. This action effectively shields the individual from the potentially damaging consequences of having their arrest photograph publicly available.
-
Legal Requirements and Procedures
The legal requirements and procedures for record sealing vary significantly by state. Some states have automatic sealing provisions, while others require the juvenile to petition the court. Eligibility criteria may include factors such as the severity of the offense, the juvenile’s age, and their subsequent behavior. The sealing process often involves a hearing where the court considers the juvenile’s rehabilitation efforts and the potential impact of the record on their future opportunities. Successful completion of the sealing process renders any related arrest photographs inaccessible, reflecting a legislative intent to protect the juvenile’s privacy and promote their successful reintegration into society.
-
Exceptions to Record Sealing
While record sealing provides significant protection, exceptions to the rule can exist. In some cases, certain agencies, such as law enforcement or government entities, may retain access to sealed records for specific purposes, such as background checks or investigations. In rare circumstances, a court may order the unsealing of a record if there is a compelling need to do so, such as in cases involving serious criminal investigations or public safety concerns. However, these exceptions are narrowly construed and do not typically result in the public release of arrest photographs. The existence of such exceptions underscores the importance of understanding the specific laws and regulations in the relevant jurisdiction.
The process of record sealing serves as a powerful mechanism for safeguarding juvenile privacy and limiting access to potentially damaging information, including arrest photographs. The legal requirements and procedures, the impact on photograph accessibility, and the exceptions to the rule all contribute to the complexity of determining photograph availability. It is improbable that any juvenile mugshots can be found, if the record has been sealed.
6. Public Interest
The concept of “public interest” presents a complex and often conflicting consideration when examining the accessibility of juvenile arrest photographs. While a general principle favors transparency in legal proceedings, the welfare and long-term prospects of minors involved in the justice system necessitate a cautious approach. Therefore, invocation of the public interest as justification for releasing these images is subject to rigorous scrutiny. Demonstrating a direct and tangible benefit to the community, outweighing the potential harm to the juvenile, is a significant legal hurdle. For example, asserting that the release of a photograph serves to inform the public about local crime rates is unlikely to suffice without a clear connection to a specific threat or ongoing investigation where identification is critical.
The practical application of the “public interest” exception typically requires a nexus between the release of the photograph and a demonstrable need for public awareness to prevent further harm. A real-world example might involve a missing juvenile suspect believed to pose an immediate threat to the community. In such a case, the release of a photograph could be justified as necessary for public safety. However, even in these circumstances, courts will carefully balance the potential benefits against the risk of stigmatizing the juvenile and jeopardizing their future. Restrictions on dissemination, such as limiting publication to specific geographic areas or timeframes, are often imposed to mitigate these risks. The burden of proof lies with the party seeking release to demonstrate that the public interest genuinely outweighs the juvenile’s right to privacy.
In summary, while the “public interest” can, in theory, provide a basis for accessing juvenile arrest photographs, the threshold for demonstrating such interest is exceedingly high. The potential for harm to the juvenile, coupled with legal protections favoring confidentiality, creates a strong presumption against release. Those seeking access must demonstrate a direct and compelling need for the photograph that outweighs the significant risks to the minor’s well-being. The challenge lies in articulating a specific and tangible public benefit that cannot be achieved through less intrusive means.
7. Parental Rights
Parental rights represent a significant consideration when assessing the possibility of accessing juvenile arrest photographs. The legal framework governing juvenile records often recognizes the role and authority of parents or legal guardians in decisions related to their children’s legal matters. This influence extends to the control and release of information pertaining to a juvenile’s involvement with the justice system, directly impacting photograph accessibility.
-
Custodial Authority and Record Access
Parents or legal guardians typically possess the right to access their child’s juvenile records, including arrest photographs. This access is often granted as a matter of course, allowing parents to understand the nature of their child’s involvement with law enforcement and to make informed decisions regarding their legal representation. However, this right does not automatically extend to third parties seeking the same information. Parental consent, or a court order overriding parental objections, may be necessary for external parties to obtain such records.
-
Notification Requirements
Many jurisdictions mandate that parents or legal guardians be notified when their child is taken into custody and when any records pertaining to their child are requested or released. This notification requirement serves to protect parental rights and ensures that parents are aware of any actions that may affect their child’s privacy and future. The failure to provide such notification can be grounds for challenging the validity of any subsequent release of information, including arrest photographs. This process acts as a safeguard against unauthorized access.
-
Consent and Waiver
Parents or legal guardians may have the authority to consent to the release of their child’s juvenile records, including arrest photographs. Such consent must be informed and voluntary, meaning that the parents fully understand the implications of releasing the information and are not coerced into doing so. However, even with parental consent, a court may still exercise its discretion to deny the release of records if it determines that doing so would not be in the child’s best interests. The ability of parents to waive their child’s privacy rights is not absolute.
-
Legal Representation and Advocacy
Parents have the right to seek legal representation for their child and to advocate for their child’s best interests throughout the juvenile justice process. This includes advocating for the sealing or expungement of records, opposing the release of arrest photographs, and challenging any actions that may violate their child’s rights. Legal counsel can advise parents on the applicable laws and procedures and help them navigate the complex legal landscape surrounding juvenile records. The involvement of legal counsel strengthens the protection against unauthorized access to juvenile information.
The interplay of parental rights with laws protecting juvenile records creates a formidable barrier to accessing juvenile arrest photographs. While parents may have certain rights regarding their child’s records, these rights are often balanced against the child’s own privacy interests and the broader public policy of protecting juveniles from the long-term consequences of youthful mistakes. The need for parental consent, the notification requirements, and the opportunity for legal representation all contribute to a system that prioritizes the protection of juvenile privacy and limits the availability of arrest photographs to external parties.
8. Data Security
Data security protocols constitute a fundamental impediment to discovering juvenile arrest photographs. Robust measures are implemented to safeguard sensitive information, rendering unauthorized access exceedingly difficult. The following facets outline the critical intersection between data security and the inaccessibility of these images.
-
Encryption Protocols
Encryption protocols are routinely employed to protect digital records containing juvenile arrest information. These protocols transform data into an unreadable format, requiring authorized decryption keys for access. This process renders any attempt to circumvent security measures and access the photograph without proper authorization virtually impossible. Law enforcement agencies, for example, utilize advanced encryption algorithms to protect sensitive data stored in their databases, effectively preventing unauthorized access to juvenile records, including mugshots. Thus, those seeking to find this type of photo are thwarted.
-
Access Control Mechanisms
Access control mechanisms restrict access to juvenile arrest records to authorized personnel only. These mechanisms typically involve multi-factor authentication, role-based permissions, and audit trails to monitor and control access attempts. Such control would be an example of limiting access solely to specific officers within a police department, preventing other staff or the public from viewing or downloading the images. This restricted access significantly reduces the likelihood of the photograph being leaked or obtained through unauthorized channels.
-
Data Breach Prevention Measures
Data breach prevention measures are implemented to protect against external threats and internal vulnerabilities that could compromise the security of juvenile arrest records. These measures may include firewalls, intrusion detection systems, regular security audits, and employee training on data security best practices. A failure in these measures could potentially expose sensitive information; however, the comprehensive implementation of these strategies greatly minimizes the risk of a data breach and the unauthorized release of juvenile mugshots. Such strategies include regular penetration testing to identify system vulnerabilities.
-
Compliance with Privacy Regulations
Adherence to privacy regulations, such as state-specific juvenile record laws and federal guidelines, mandates strict data security protocols. These regulations often require agencies to implement specific security measures to protect juvenile records from unauthorized access, disclosure, or misuse. Non-compliance can result in significant legal penalties and reputational damage, incentivizing agencies to prioritize data security and safeguard juvenile arrest photographs. This ensures that even if a photograph exists, legal compliance effectively prevents its discoverability.
The confluence of these data security facets significantly restricts the discoverability of juvenile arrest photographs. Encryption, access controls, breach prevention, and regulatory compliance collectively create a robust security posture that makes unauthorized access extremely challenging, thereby upholding the legal and ethical imperative to protect the privacy of minors involved in the justice system.
9. Limited Access
The concept of “Limited Access” is inextricably linked to the challenges associated with attempting to find juvenile arrest photographs. Legal and ethical frameworks deliberately restrict the availability of these records, resulting in limited access as the primary obstacle in this pursuit. This restriction is not merely a bureaucratic inconvenience but a deliberate policy intended to protect the privacy and future opportunities of minors involved in the justice system. The causal relationship is clear: laws are enacted to limit access, and consequently, these photographs are difficult, if not impossible, to obtain legally. Therefore, understanding the scope and nature of “Limited Access” is a fundamental component in any discussion of “how to find juvenile mugshots.”
One practical example is the application of state juvenile record sealing laws. Upon reaching a certain age or fulfilling specific conditions, a juvenile’s arrest record may be sealed, rendering it inaccessible to the public. In such cases, the arrest photograph, which is considered part of the record, is also sealed, effectively erasing its public existence. Even if the photograph was previously available through a law enforcement agency’s website or a third-party database, the sealing order nullifies that access. Another example involves the stringent access control measures implemented by law enforcement agencies. Access to juvenile arrest records is typically restricted to authorized personnel, such as investigators directly involved in the case or court officials with a legitimate need to review the information. These limitations underscore that the photograph is not freely available and that specific legal authorization is necessary for access.
In summary, the deliberate imposition of “Limited Access” forms the core challenge in any endeavor to find juvenile arrest photographs. The various legal and procedural mechanisms designed to protect juvenile privacyincluding record sealing, access control, and confidentiality provisionscreate a system where these photographs are, by design, difficult to locate. This understanding is crucial, as it highlights the ethical and legal considerations that must be weighed against any perceived need for the photograph. It also points to the reality that, in most cases, legal avenues for obtaining these images are severely restricted or altogether non-existent.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following questions address common inquiries regarding the accessibility of juvenile arrest photographs, providing clarity on the legal and practical considerations involved.
Question 1: Are juvenile arrest photographs public records?
Generally, juvenile arrest photographs are not considered public records. Laws prioritize the confidentiality of juvenile records, significantly restricting public access. Exceptions may exist under specific circumstances, often requiring a court order.
Question 2: Under what circumstances might a juvenile arrest photograph be accessible?
Accessibility may be granted if a court determines that the public interest outweighs the juvenile’s right to privacy. Such instances are rare and typically involve serious offenses or situations where the photograph’s release is deemed necessary for public safety. Additionally, some states might allow access if the juvenile is tried as an adult.
Question 3: Can parental consent override juvenile record confidentiality laws?
While parental consent is a factor, it does not automatically override confidentiality laws. Courts retain the ultimate authority to determine whether releasing a juvenile arrest photograph is in the child’s best interest and consistent with applicable statutes. Parental consent alone is insufficient to compel the release of protected records.
Question 4: What is the impact of record sealing on photograph accessibility?
Record sealing effectively removes a juvenile’s arrest record, including any associated photographs, from public view. Once a record is sealed, access is typically restricted to law enforcement agencies and other authorized entities, rendering the photograph unavailable to the general public.
Question 5: What legal consequences can result from unauthorized attempts to obtain juvenile arrest photographs?
Unauthorized attempts to obtain juvenile arrest photographs can result in civil and criminal penalties, depending on the applicable state and federal laws. Violations may include charges related to invasion of privacy, unauthorized access to computer systems, and the dissemination of confidential information.
Question 6: How do data security measures affect the availability of juvenile arrest photographs?
Robust data security measures, such as encryption and access control mechanisms, are implemented to protect juvenile arrest records from unauthorized access. These measures significantly limit the risk of data breaches and unauthorized dissemination of photographs, thereby enhancing the confidentiality of these records.
These FAQs provide a general overview. Specific circumstances and jurisdictional variations may impact the accessibility of juvenile arrest photographs. Consultation with legal counsel is advised for specific situations.
The next section will examine the ethical considerations surrounding attempts to find and utilize juvenile arrest photographs.
Considerations Regarding the Pursuit of Juvenile Arrest Photographs
The following outlines critical considerations relevant to any attempt to locate photographic records associated with juvenile arrests. Given the sensitive nature of these records and the legal protections afforded to minors, a measured and informed approach is essential.
Tip 1: Prioritize Legal Compliance: Any effort to access these photographs must adhere strictly to applicable federal and state laws. Seek legal counsel to ensure compliance with record sealing statutes, confidentiality provisions, and other relevant regulations. Understanding the legal framework is paramount before initiating any search.
Tip 2: Understand the Limitations of Public Records Requests: Juvenile arrest records are generally not considered public records. Therefore, standard public records requests are unlikely to yield results. Be prepared to encounter significant resistance and potential legal challenges.
Tip 3: Recognize the Importance of a Court Order: In most jurisdictions, a court order is required to access juvenile arrest photographs. Securing such an order necessitates demonstrating a compelling need and persuading the court that the release serves a legitimate purpose without unduly harming the juvenile.
Tip 4: Be Mindful of Ethical Implications: Even if legal access is possible, carefully consider the ethical implications of obtaining and disseminating a juvenile’s arrest photograph. The potential for stigmatization, reputational damage, and long-term harm warrants a thoughtful and responsible approach.
Tip 5: Scrutinize Third-Party Sources with Caution: Exercise extreme caution when dealing with third-party websites or databases that claim to offer access to juvenile arrest photographs. These sources may be unreliable, inaccurate, or even illegal. Verifying the legitimacy and legality of any such source is crucial.
Tip 6: Understand the Impact of Record Sealing and Expungement: If a juvenile’s record has been sealed or expunged, any associated photographs are generally inaccessible. Recognize that attempting to circumvent these legal protections can have serious legal consequences.
Tip 7: Consider Alternative Sources of Information: Explore alternative sources of information that do not involve directly accessing juvenile arrest photographs. For example, court documents, news reports, and interviews may provide relevant details without compromising the juvenile’s privacy.
These considerations emphasize the importance of proceeding with caution and adhering to ethical and legal guidelines. The pursuit of juvenile arrest photographs should be undertaken only when a compelling need exists and when all other avenues have been exhausted.
The final section will provide an overview of the ethical considerations surrounding juvenile records.
Conclusion
This exploration of “how to find juvenile mugshots” reveals the significant legal and ethical obstacles inherent in such an endeavor. Laws protecting juvenile confidentiality, record sealing procedures, data security protocols, and judicial oversight collectively create a system designed to limit access to these sensitive records. While specific circumstances and jurisdictional variations may influence accessibility, the prevailing principle prioritizes the privacy and rehabilitation of minors involved in the legal system.
Consequently, any attempt to find juvenile mugshots requires careful consideration of the potential harm to the individual and strict adherence to applicable laws. The public interest, parental rights, and the legal framework governing juvenile records all contribute to a complex balancing act. Given the substantial restrictions and ethical considerations, alternative approaches to obtaining information should be considered whenever possible. Furthermore, due to frequent changes to both the ethical and legal climate surrounding these matters, consulting qualified legal counsel is of the utmost importance, and is highly recommended.
