California drivers who receive a citation for failing to properly observe a stop sign may explore several avenues for contesting the violation. Dismissal of the ticket is the desired outcome for many recipients, allowing them to avoid associated fines, points on their driving record, and potential increases in insurance premiums. Successfully challenging the citation requires understanding California traffic law and court procedures.
The potential ramifications of a moving violation in California extend beyond the immediate monetary penalty. Points assessed against a driver’s record can lead to license suspension if a certain threshold is reached. Insurance companies also use driving records to assess risk, often resulting in higher premiums for drivers with recent violations. Therefore, pursuing dismissal can offer significant long-term benefits.
The following sections outline the common strategies and procedures involved in disputing a stop sign ticket in California, including trial by written declaration, courtroom defenses, and potential mitigating circumstances that may lead to a favorable outcome.
1. Trial by Written Declaration
A Trial by Written Declaration in California offers a procedural alternative to appearing in court to contest a traffic ticket. This method allows a defendant to submit a written defense to the court, which the citing officer then has the opportunity to rebut in writing. The court reviews both submissions and renders a decision based on the presented evidence.
-
Submitting a Written Defense
The defendant must prepare a clear and concise written statement outlining the reasons for contesting the stop sign ticket. This statement should include factual details, legal arguments, and any supporting evidence, such as photographs or diagrams. The effectiveness of the declaration hinges on its ability to persuasively argue reasonable doubt regarding the violation.
-
Officer’s Rebuttal
Following the defendant’s submission, the citing officer is provided the opportunity to submit a written rebuttal. This rebuttal typically reinforces the officer’s original observations and provides further justification for the issuance of the citation. The strength of the rebuttal often depends on the clarity and detail of the officer’s initial report and recollection of the event.
-
Court’s Decision
The court reviews the defendant’s declaration and the officer’s rebuttal to determine whether the prosecution has proven the violation beyond a reasonable doubt. If the court finds in favor of the defendant, the ticket is dismissed. If the court finds against the defendant, the option to request a new trial in person remains available.
-
Advantages and Disadvantages
A Trial by Written Declaration offers convenience by eliminating the need for a court appearance. However, it also prevents the defendant from questioning the officer directly or presenting live testimony. Furthermore, the outcome is often heavily influenced by the content and persuasiveness of the written submissions. A poorly written declaration can be detrimental to the case.
The Trial by Written Declaration provides a strategic avenue for those seeking to dispute a stop sign ticket. Its success relies on a well-crafted defense and a clear understanding of the law. Although it presents a less confrontational approach, it demands careful preparation and persuasive writing to effectively challenge the citation.
2. Insufficient Evidence
Insufficient evidence forms a cornerstone defense when challenging a stop sign ticket. The prosecution bears the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the driver violated the law. A lack of compelling evidence can lead to dismissal of the citation.
-
Lack of Clear Observation
If the citing officer’s vantage point was obstructed, or if the officer was too far away to clearly observe the vehicle’s actions at the stop sign, the prosecution’s case may be weakened. For instance, if trees or other vehicles blocked the officer’s view, the ability to accurately determine if the vehicle came to a complete stop may be questionable. This scenario creates doubt regarding the validity of the evidence presented.
-
Absence of Supporting Documentation
In some cases, supporting evidence, such as dashcam footage or witness statements, might be absent. While the officer’s testimony carries weight, a lack of corroborating evidence can raise questions about the accuracy of the officer’s recollection. The absence of any independent confirmation of the violation can make it challenging for the prosecution to meet the burden of proof.
-
Conflicting Testimony
If the driver can present credible evidence that contradicts the officer’s testimony, such as their own testimony or that of a passenger, it can create reasonable doubt. For example, the driver might testify that they did come to a complete stop, while the officer claims otherwise. The court must then weigh the credibility of each party’s testimony, and conflicting accounts can lead to dismissal if the judge is not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt.
-
Failure to Properly Identify the Vehicle
In certain situations, the officer may not be able to definitively identify the specific vehicle that committed the violation. This is particularly relevant in high-traffic areas or if the officer was observing multiple vehicles simultaneously. If the description of the vehicle is vague or inaccurate, it can undermine the prosecution’s case and create reasonable doubt about whether the correct vehicle was cited.
Successfully arguing insufficient evidence requires a careful examination of the facts surrounding the stop sign violation. By highlighting weaknesses in the prosecution’s case, such as an obstructed view, lack of supporting documentation, conflicting testimony, or a failure to properly identify the vehicle, a driver can significantly increase the chances of having the stop sign ticket dismissed.
3. Obstructed Sign
An obstructed stop sign constitutes a significant defense when disputing a stop sign ticket in California. If a driver can demonstrate that the sign was not clearly visible due to obstructions, it can provide grounds for ticket dismissal. This defense hinges on proving that the obstruction impaired the driver’s ability to perceive the sign and comply with the law.
-
Vegetation Overgrowth
Vegetation, such as trees, bushes, or other foliage, can obscure a stop sign, making it difficult or impossible for drivers to see the sign until they are in close proximity. If the vegetation is overgrown to the extent that it significantly blocks the sign’s visibility from a reasonable distance, this can serve as a valid defense. Photographic evidence documenting the obstruction is crucial in such cases. This evidence must clearly depict how the overgrowth concealed the sign at the time of the alleged infraction.
-
Construction or Temporary Obstructions
Construction projects, temporary signage, or parked vehicles can also create obstructions that impede the visibility of a stop sign. If a construction crew inadvertently blocks the sign with equipment or materials, or if a vehicle is illegally parked in a manner that conceals the sign, this can be grounds for dismissal. The driver must be able to demonstrate that the obstruction was present and significantly impacted their ability to see the stop sign. Documentation, such as photographs or witness statements, can be used to substantiate the claim.
-
Sign Damage or Vandalism
If the stop sign itself is damaged, defaced, or missing portions, its visibility and legibility may be compromised. Vandalism, weather damage, or normal wear and tear can render the sign ineffective. If a driver can demonstrate that the sign was in a state of disrepair at the time of the alleged violation, this can be used as a defense. Evidence, such as photographs showing the sign’s condition, is essential to support this claim.
-
Improper Sign Placement
California law dictates specific requirements for the placement and height of stop signs. If a stop sign is not positioned according to these regulations, it may be considered improperly placed, potentially contributing to reduced visibility. If a driver can demonstrate that the sign’s placement deviated from the legal requirements and that this deviation contributed to their failure to see the sign, it can serve as a defense. This often requires referencing the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) and providing evidence of non-compliance.
Successfully utilizing the “obstructed sign” defense requires the driver to present compelling evidence that the obstruction directly contributed to their failure to comply with the stop sign. The stronger the evidence, the more likely it is that the court will consider the obstruction a mitigating factor, potentially leading to dismissal of the ticket. Careful documentation and a clear explanation of how the obstruction impacted visibility are key elements of this defense.
4. Emergency Situation
An emergency situation can serve as a potential defense against a stop sign ticket in California, although its success depends heavily on the specific circumstances and the driver’s ability to demonstrate the exigency of the situation. The court will evaluate whether the emergency reasonably justified the deviation from traffic laws.
-
Imminent Threat to Life or Safety
If a driver ran a stop sign to avoid an immediate and serious threat to life or safety, such as evading a collision or escaping a dangerous situation, this can be a valid defense. The driver must demonstrate that the action was necessary to prevent imminent harm to themselves or others. Supporting evidence, such as witness statements or police reports, can strengthen the case. The argument centers on the premise that adhering to traffic laws would have resulted in a more severe outcome.
-
Medical Emergency
Transporting a person experiencing a medical emergency, where delaying travel to comply with a stop sign could have resulted in serious injury or death, can also be grounds for defense. The driver must provide credible evidence of the medical emergency, such as medical records, witness testimony, or a statement from the individual being transported. The key is to establish that the need for immediate medical attention outweighed the risk of violating the traffic law. Simply stating a medical condition is insufficient; the urgency and severity must be clearly demonstrated.
-
Good Samaritan Actions
In situations where a driver violates a stop sign while rendering aid to someone in distress, a court might consider this a mitigating factor. This scenario often involves witnessing an accident and quickly moving to assist injured parties or contacting emergency services. The driver must demonstrate that the violation was directly related to providing assistance and that their actions were reasonable under the circumstances. A detailed explanation of the situation and supporting evidence of the assistance provided is critical.
-
Limited Applicability and Burden of Proof
It is important to note that the “emergency situation” defense is not a blanket excuse for violating traffic laws. The driver bears the burden of proving the existence and severity of the emergency, as well as demonstrating that the violation was a reasonable response to the situation. The defense is most likely to succeed when the emergency is severe, unavoidable, and the driver’s actions were directly related to mitigating the emergency’s impact. Without compelling evidence, this defense is unlikely to be successful.
The “emergency situation” defense provides a narrow pathway for challenging a stop sign ticket. Its success relies on a clear and convincing demonstration of the emergency’s existence, severity, and the reasonableness of the driver’s response. While the defense can be valid in specific circumstances, it requires substantial evidence to overcome the presumption that the driver violated traffic laws without justifiable cause.
5. Officer’s View Obstructed
The assertion that an officer’s view was obstructed is a potential defense when contesting a stop sign ticket in California. If proven, the argument can undermine the validity of the officer’s observations and, consequently, the prosecution’s case. The success of this defense hinges on establishing that the obstruction significantly impaired the officer’s ability to accurately perceive the driver’s actions.
-
Distance and Angle of Observation
The distance between the officer and the vehicle, as well as the angle of observation, are critical factors. If the officer was located too far from the intersection, or if the angle made it difficult to clearly see whether the vehicle came to a complete stop, the defense can argue that the observation was unreliable. For example, an officer positioned across a large intersection may have difficulty determining if a vehicle’s wheels completely stopped rotating. The driver can present evidence demonstrating the officer’s disadvantageous position to challenge the accuracy of the observation. This might include diagrams of the intersection or photographic evidence of the officer’s location relative to the stop sign and the vehicle’s path.
-
Intervening Obstacles: Vehicles and Pedestrians
Moving vehicles or pedestrians can temporarily obstruct an officer’s view of a vehicle approaching a stop sign. If a bus, large truck, or group of pedestrians passed between the officer and the vehicle at the critical moment, it can cast doubt on the officer’s ability to accurately assess whether a complete stop occurred. The defense can use witness statements or traffic camera footage, if available, to corroborate the presence of such obstacles. Successfully arguing this point requires demonstrating that the obstruction coincided precisely with the time the violation allegedly occurred.
-
Environmental Conditions: Weather and Light
Adverse weather conditions, such as heavy rain, fog, or glare from the sun, can significantly impair an officer’s visibility. Similarly, poor lighting conditions during nighttime hours can make it difficult to clearly observe a vehicle’s actions. The defense can introduce weather reports or expert testimony to demonstrate that visibility was compromised at the time of the alleged violation. Establishing that the officer’s vision was impaired due to these conditions can create reasonable doubt regarding the accuracy of their observations.
-
Officer’s Admission of Obstruction
In some instances, the officer’s own notes or testimony may contain statements that inadvertently acknowledge potential obstructions to their view. A careful review of the officer’s report may reveal admissions of limited visibility or the presence of intervening obstacles. Highlighting these inconsistencies can significantly weaken the prosecution’s case. Even a subtle statement suggesting a less than optimal vantage point can be leveraged to raise doubts about the officer’s certainty.
The defense of an obstructed officer’s view is predicated on undermining the credibility of the officer’s observations. The greater the evidence presented to support the existence and impact of the obstruction, the higher the likelihood of creating reasonable doubt and, potentially, achieving dismissal of the stop sign ticket. Thorough investigation and meticulous presentation of evidence are crucial to the success of this defense strategy.
6. Calibration of Speed Measuring Device
While seemingly unrelated to stop sign infractions, the calibration of speed measuring devices can indirectly influence the dismissal of a stop sign ticket in California. The connection arises in situations where the stop sign violation is predicated on secondary observations, such as the speed at which the vehicle approached the intersection. If the officer used radar or lidar to estimate the vehicle’s speed before the alleged failure to stop, the accuracy of that measurement becomes relevant. Challenging the calibration of the device introduces doubt regarding the officer’s perception of the events leading to the citation. For example, if the officer asserts the vehicle was traveling at an excessive speed before failing to stop completely, and that speed was determined using a speed measuring device, a successful challenge to the device’s calibration could weaken the officer’s overall narrative, creating reasonable doubt about the entire sequence of events. This is especially true if the violation is based on the driver’s intent to evade stopping, which is often inferred from speed and behavior. A faulty speed reading makes it more difficult to prove this intent beyond a reasonable doubt.
The practical application of this understanding lies in scrutinizing the officer’s notes and seeking documentation related to the speed measuring device used, if applicable. Requesting calibration records and understanding the maintenance schedule of the device allows for identifying potential discrepancies. If the records indicate the device was not properly calibrated or maintained according to legal standards, this information can be presented to the court. Moreover, expert testimony regarding the proper use and potential errors of speed measuring devices can further support the argument that the officer’s speed estimation was unreliable, thereby affecting the validity of the stop sign violation charge. However, it’s crucial to note that this defense is most effective when the alleged stop sign violation is closely tied to speed, rather than a clear and direct observation of a complete failure to stop.
In summary, while not a direct defense to running a stop sign, challenging the calibration of a speed measuring device can indirectly contribute to the dismissal of a stop sign ticket when the officer’s judgment relies on speed estimations made by that device. The key insight is recognizing the interconnectedness of the evidence and identifying vulnerabilities within the prosecution’s narrative. The challenge lies in obtaining the necessary documentation and presenting a convincing argument that the device’s potential inaccuracies cast doubt on the officer’s perception of the violation. This approach underscores the importance of examining every aspect of the case to identify potential defenses, even those seemingly tangential to the core issue.
7. Mistaken Identity
Mistaken identity presents a viable defense strategy when contesting a stop sign ticket. This defense centers on the assertion that the cited vehicle or driver was incorrectly identified. If a driver can demonstrate reasonable doubt regarding the accuracy of the identification, dismissal of the ticket may be warranted. Establishing mistaken identity requires providing compelling evidence that supports the claim of misidentification. This evidence might include documentation proving the vehicle was elsewhere at the time of the violation or verifiable discrepancies between the description of the vehicle or driver in the citation and the actual characteristics of the defendant and their vehicle.
A practical example includes a scenario where the citing officer recorded an incorrect license plate number. If the driver can present evidence, such as repair bills or GPS tracking data, indicating the vehicle was miles away at the time of the alleged infraction, the claim of mistaken identity gains significant credibility. Similarly, discrepancies in the vehicle’s make, model, or color, as noted in the citation compared to the vehicle’s registration, can further support the defense. In cases involving driver identification, the defendant might present alibi evidence, such as witness testimony or security camera footage, demonstrating they were not driving the vehicle at the time of the incident. The court’s assessment of mistaken identity hinges on the persuasiveness and credibility of the evidence presented, emphasizing the importance of thorough preparation and accurate documentation.
Successfully arguing mistaken identity requires meticulous attention to detail and the ability to present a clear and convincing alternative narrative. Challenges include obtaining reliable evidence and effectively communicating discrepancies to the court. However, a well-supported claim of mistaken identity can lead to the dismissal of a stop sign ticket, avoiding potential fines and points on the driving record. The focus must remain on demonstrating that the cited vehicle or driver was not the one responsible for the alleged violation, thereby undermining the foundation of the prosecution’s case and establishing reasonable doubt.
8. Corrective Action (Traffic School)
While not a direct dismissal, attending traffic school in California offers a mechanism to mitigate the negative consequences of a stop sign ticket, often serving as a practical alternative when outright dismissal is unattainable. Successful completion of traffic school can prevent points from being added to a driver’s record, which can influence insurance rates and potential license suspension. Therefore, it represents a strategic approach for managing the impact of a traffic violation.
-
Eligibility Requirements
California law establishes specific eligibility criteria for traffic school. Generally, a driver must possess a valid driver’s license, the violation must be for a minor infraction, and the driver cannot have attended traffic school for a prior violation within the past 18 months. Additionally, the court must approve the driver’s request to attend traffic school. Meeting these requirements is a prerequisite for utilizing traffic school as a means of avoiding points on the driving record.
-
Avoiding Points on Driving Record
The primary benefit of completing traffic school is the prevention of points being added to the driver’s record with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). Points accumulate with each moving violation, and exceeding a certain threshold can lead to license suspension or revocation. By attending traffic school, the conviction is masked from the driver’s record, effectively neutralizing the potential for increased insurance premiums and safeguarding driving privileges.
-
Mitigating Financial Impact
Although traffic school involves additional costs, including tuition and administrative fees, these expenses can often be less than the long-term financial implications of points on a driving record. Insurance companies use driving records to assess risk, and drivers with points typically face higher premiums. In this context, traffic school can be viewed as a cost-effective investment in maintaining lower insurance rates over time.
-
Procedures for Enrollment and Completion
Following court approval, drivers must enroll in a DMV-licensed traffic school, which can be completed online, in a classroom setting, or through a combination of methods. The course typically covers traffic laws, safe driving practices, and defensive driving techniques. Upon successful completion of the course, the traffic school notifies the court, and the conviction is masked from the driver’s record. Adhering to deadlines and completing the course diligently are crucial for ensuring the points are successfully withheld from the driver’s record.
Although traffic school does not erase the fact that a stop sign ticket was issued, it effectively mitigates the long-term repercussions associated with the violation. For drivers who are ineligible for dismissal or prefer a more certain outcome, traffic school represents a pragmatic and legally sanctioned mechanism for preserving their driving record and minimizing financial burdens. It functions as a viable recourse when pursuing complete dismissal proves unsuccessful or impractical.
9. Plea Bargaining
Plea bargaining, while less common in minor traffic offenses such as stop sign violations, can occasionally present a pathway, albeit indirect, toward mitigating the consequences associated with the citation in California. Its application often depends on specific circumstances, such as multiple violations arising from the same incident or the presence of mitigating factors that influence the prosecutor’s discretion. Plea bargaining typically involves negotiating with the prosecuting attorney to reduce the charge to a lesser offense, which may carry a smaller fine or fewer points on the driver’s record. While outright dismissal is the ultimate goal, a plea bargain offers a compromise that can minimize the long-term impact of the ticket. The success of plea bargaining hinges on the strength of the defense’s arguments and the prosecutor’s willingness to negotiate, which often depends on factors such as court caseload and the severity of the alleged violation.
An example of plea bargaining in the context of a stop sign ticket might involve a driver initially cited for both failing to stop and speeding. The driver’s attorney could negotiate with the prosecutor to drop the speeding charge in exchange for a guilty plea on the stop sign violation. This approach could result in a reduced fine and fewer points on the driving record, as the speeding charge typically carries a more severe penalty. Another scenario involves a driver with a clean driving record who demonstrates remorse and a willingness to improve their driving habits. In such cases, the prosecutor might agree to reduce the charge to a non-moving violation, which does not result in points on the driver’s record. The practical significance of understanding plea bargaining lies in recognizing it as a potential tool for mitigating consequences when outright dismissal is unlikely. It requires assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the case, identifying potential negotiating points, and engaging in effective communication with the prosecuting attorney.
In summary, plea bargaining represents a nuanced strategy for managing the impact of a stop sign ticket in California. While it does not guarantee dismissal, it can offer a viable means of reducing fines, minimizing points on the driving record, and ultimately preserving driving privileges. The process necessitates careful assessment of the case, effective negotiation skills, and a willingness to compromise. The availability and potential benefits of plea bargaining underscore the importance of exploring all available options when contesting a traffic citation, even those that do not result in complete exoneration. The challenges include convincing the prosecution to negotiate and accepting a resolution that may not be ideal but offers a more favorable outcome than a conviction on the original charge.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following questions address common concerns and misconceptions regarding challenging a stop sign violation in California. The provided information aims to clarify the legal process and potential defense strategies.
Question 1: Does ignoring a stop sign ticket lead to automatic dismissal?
Ignoring a stop sign ticket does not result in automatic dismissal. Failure to respond to the citation within the specified timeframe may lead to a default judgment against the driver, resulting in fines, points on the driving record, and potential suspension of driving privileges.
Question 2: Is it possible to have a stop sign ticket dismissed based on a “technicality?”
While not guaranteed, challenging a ticket based on procedural errors or technical violations is possible. This might involve discrepancies in the citation’s information, such as an incorrect vehicle description or a flawed recitation of the applicable Vehicle Code section. However, the court will assess the significance of the error and its impact on the validity of the citation.
Question 3: Can photographic or video evidence from a personal device be used to contest a stop sign ticket?
Photographic or video evidence can be submitted as part of a defense. However, the court will evaluate the authenticity, relevance, and clarity of the evidence. The evidence must clearly demonstrate the driver’s compliance with the law or provide a reasonable explanation for the alleged violation.
Question 4: Does a clean driving record guarantee dismissal of a stop sign ticket?
A clean driving record, while a mitigating factor, does not guarantee ticket dismissal. The court will consider the circumstances of the violation and the evidence presented. However, a clean record may influence the prosecutor’s willingness to offer a plea bargain or allow attendance at traffic school.
Question 5: What is the typical cost associated with fighting a stop sign ticket?
The cost of contesting a stop sign ticket can vary. It may include court fees, attorney fees (if legal representation is sought), and expenses related to gathering evidence, such as photographs or expert testimony. The specific costs depend on the complexity of the case and the chosen defense strategy.
Question 6: Is it advisable to hire an attorney to contest a stop sign ticket?
The decision to hire an attorney depends on the individual’s circumstances. While not always necessary, legal representation can be beneficial, especially in complex cases or when facing significant penalties. An attorney can provide legal advice, represent the driver in court, and navigate the legal process effectively.
Successfully contesting a stop sign ticket requires understanding California traffic law and employing effective defense strategies. While dismissal is not always guaranteed, pursuing available legal options can potentially mitigate the consequences of the violation.
The next section will provide a concise summary of key takeaways from this discussion.
Tips for Contesting a Stop Sign Ticket in California
Successfully disputing a stop sign ticket requires a strategic approach and a thorough understanding of legal options. Adherence to the following tips can enhance the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
Tip 1: Meticulously Document the Scene: Immediately after receiving the citation, if safe and feasible, document the intersection, including the stop sign’s visibility, any obstructions, and the officer’s vantage point. Photographs and videos can serve as compelling evidence in a written declaration or courtroom defense.
Tip 2: Request Discovery: Obtain all available documentation from the citing agency, including the officer’s notes, radar calibration records (if applicable), and any relevant witness statements. Scrutinize these documents for inconsistencies or errors that may weaken the prosecution’s case.
Tip 3: Explore the Trial by Written Declaration: Carefully consider the option of a trial by written declaration, particularly if a court appearance presents a hardship. Craft a clear, concise, and persuasive written defense, supported by evidence, demonstrating why the ticket should be dismissed.
Tip 4: Consult with Legal Counsel: If the circumstances surrounding the ticket are complex or the potential consequences are significant, consult with an attorney experienced in California traffic law. Legal counsel can provide guidance, assess the strengths and weaknesses of the case, and represent the driver in court.
Tip 5: Understand Admissible Evidence: Familiarize oneself with the rules of evidence to ensure that any submitted documentation or testimony is admissible in court. Hearsay or unsubstantiated claims will likely be rejected by the court.
Tip 6: Be Prepared to Testify Truthfully and Clearly: If a court appearance is necessary, prepare to testify truthfully and clearly about the events leading to the citation. Maintain a respectful demeanor and avoid argumentative or confrontational behavior.
Tip 7: Consider Corrective Action: If outright dismissal is unlikely, explore the possibility of attending traffic school to prevent points from being added to the driving record. This represents a practical alternative for mitigating the long-term consequences of the ticket.
Employing these strategies and understanding the nuances of California traffic law can significantly improve the chances of successfully contesting a stop sign ticket. Thorough preparation and a well-articulated defense are essential for achieving a favorable outcome.
The concluding section of this article will summarize the key takeaways and provide final guidance regarding contesting a stop sign ticket in California.
Conclusion
This exploration of “how to get a stop sign ticket dismissed in california” has highlighted various defense strategies, ranging from challenging the validity of the officer’s observation to demonstrating mitigating circumstances. Successful navigation of this process demands a clear understanding of California traffic law, meticulous documentation, and strategic employment of available legal options. While dismissal is not guaranteed, a well-prepared and articulated defense significantly improves the chances of a favorable outcome.
Contesting a traffic citation represents a consequential decision, requiring careful consideration of the potential benefits and associated challenges. Individuals facing a stop sign ticket are encouraged to thoroughly evaluate their options, seek legal counsel when appropriate, and pursue a course of action aligned with their individual circumstances and objectives. The commitment to understanding legal rights and responsibilities remains paramount in ensuring a fair and just resolution.
