The phrase in question refers to methods, attempted or successful, of circumventing the security measures implemented by Honorlock, a proctoring service used by educational institutions. These methods may include, but are not limited to, using external devices, accessing unauthorized materials, or employing assistance from other individuals during examinations. The purpose is to gain an unfair advantage by obtaining answers or information not permitted under examination rules.
The existence of such attempts reflects a broader concern regarding academic integrity in online testing environments. Understanding the vulnerabilities and potential loopholes exploited to undermine proctoring systems is crucial for educational institutions seeking to maintain fair assessment standards. Historical context reveals a continuous cycle of advancement in proctoring technology met with evolving methods of circumvention, leading to an ongoing arms race in the realm of online test security.
